Are “smart months” real? Here's what the science says about when your baby’s born

But a recent, and much larger Japanese study offers a more nuanced view. Rather than enjoying a natural advantage, younger children in a school year—those born just before the academic cut-off—may actually face more hurdles, both academically and socially, as they move through school.

The science behind the belief

The Harvard researchers tracked children over seven years and found that those born in the final quarter of the year often scored higher on IQ tests and demonstrated greater creative thinking.

They suggested that being the youngest in class might encourage these children to work harder to keep up, making them more determined, adaptable and imaginative.

However, a 2023 study published in Labour Economics, drawing on data from over 1 million students in Japan, tells a different story.

Researchers found that younger children in a school cohort often scored lower in both academic tests and key noncognitive skills like self-control and perseverance—gaps that didn’t fully close even by the end of secondary school.

Being the youngest: advantage or uphill battle?

Some experts have long speculated that being the youngest in the class may help children develop grit and resilience. But the Japanese study suggests these gains aren’t automatic.

In practice, younger pupils—and their families—often make what researchers call “compensatory investments”. This might include more hours of studying, greater use of private tutoring, or other structured learning activities aimed at helping them catch up.

While this additional effort can help close gaps in academic performance, it can come at the expense of time spent on sport, creative play or social activities—areas that nurture emotional confidence, independence and creativity.

A closer look at social development

One of the more sobering findings from the Japanese study is that the youngest kids in a school year are more likely to report poorer relationships with teachers and peers.

These less supportive social dynamics can hinder a child’s emotional resilience and sense of self-efficacy (that all-important “I can do this!” mindset).

This contrasts with the more optimistic tone of the Harvard study, which credits end-of-year births with boosting independence and social flexibility.

The truth may be more complex: the youngest may work harder and build grit, but they might also feel left behind socially.

Does the season still matter?

While some earlier interpretations of the Harvard study suggested that winter babies may benefit from more calm, attentive early months—due to seasonal routines or fewer illnesses—the Japanese researchers found no strong link between birth season and health or socioeconomic outcomes.

What continues to matter most, according to decades of developmental research, is the child’s early environment. Studies from the Harvard Center on the Developing Child consistently show that nurturing, responsive care is what truly shapes a child’s ability to thrive.

What does this mean for your family?

So, should you worry if your child is one of the youngest in their class? Absolutely not.

A child’s birth month is just one of many influences—and possibly not the most important. Some children will take off early, others need more time and support. That’s normal.

What matters most is recognising your child’s unique pace and personality—and giving them the steady encouragement, emotional safety and opportunities they need to grow into their best selves.

Read more:

• Thousands of parents fined for not strapping children in cars – and it’s set to spike this spring
• Lullaby Trust endorses Angelcare baby monitor in landmark move to support bereaved families
• Let your baby nap near the washing machine, expert says
• What is Labubu? Meet the cute-but-creepy collectable toy monster trending with kids (and adults)